How To Install Windows On Asus Motherboard

iv hours ago, I.nfraR.ed said:

Have you tested the performance? On Ryzen2 (3000 series) XP is not that fast.

Not surprising at all. The Windows Kernel Team works constantly to support and optimize all platforms months before they are released (read in a tweet some time ago). It's not always perfect I guess (Ryzen ability programme for example), but from my knowledge there are many things to consider for best operation, compatibility and security.

As already mentioned the ACPI implementation can be (or sometimes has to exist) different like interrupt routing for the CPU and platform devices for case. The selection of timer for the System Interrupt is a part of this every bit well. And although lots of the ACPI implementation is actually provided by vendors as AML, the OS still has most of the work to do to interpret these correctly. I'm regularly taking a peek at the Linux kernel source code when implementing hardware-based features for my BenchMate kernel driver and well allow's say it'due south a lot to have in. Also beloved the hate comments from the kernel devs for fking things up that have therefor be stock-still in software.

Some other large thing is the thread scheduler, that is pretty close to the hardware. Optimizations at that place can atomic number 82 to improved ability efficiency, ameliorate latency and of course improved performance. I gather that's why a modern implementation of the scheduler leads to better multithreading performance in benchmarks on the latest platforms.

I've likewise seen many different lawmaking paths in the WIN32 API every bit well, where some lead to a syscall (userland to kernel transition for a hardware-based implementation) while on other platforms that'southward not necessary.

Ok, I'm already rambling. What I'm trying to say is that Windows XP is bully for old platforms and/or old benchmarks. It has less overhead than any mod Windows considering XP but has very piddling security mitigations. Information technology's also a native 32 bit Bone, so 32 bit code doesn't have to get through the WOW64 subsystem. And allow'due south not forget that former benchmarks were compiled with the appropriate tools at that time. Two famous examples:

• SuperPi: Compiled with the Borland C compiler that was especially famous for optimized 32 bit code back then.
• wPrime: Visual Basic vi that hasn't even real threading, but uses COM to communicate between multiple spawned processes. The spawning is btw part of the time measured, so this besides benches the COM implementation of the Bone.

I uncertainty that none of these would be faster on Windows XP if they were compiled for 64 bit, with latest compilers, using modern C++ with cache locality in mind and advisable threading models (OpenMP, Intel's TBB, ...).

Edited November 6, 2019 by _mat_

Source: https://community.hwbot.org/topic/192682-windows-xp-on-asus-z390-motherboards-and-others/

Posted by: darbyacend1994.blogspot.com

Share this post